fomapan 400 vs hp5

I like the old-fashioned look of Foma films, here Fomapan 200 Creative: Camera: Mamiya C330 Professional. As registered member you'd see an image here. I really disliked Fomapan 400. It also dries flat so picking it up is a little trickier. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. These are terrific. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). In any case, most of my enjoyment comes from the process, not my crummy images. Ill soon be trying it at box and slightly overdeveloping it at a high temperature to see if I can achieve similar results to overexposing it by one stop. Im here a bit late, but I would like to add Rollei RPX. Mir ist das Ergebnis ein wenig zu krnig. Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. Go figure. Although these werent excessively And while it does perform better and is a little more accessible to more people, I still think that the film does an amazing job as a 400-speed film. My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. A couple of years ago, I spent the summer shooting different B&W films. While FPP doesnt disclose who manufactures their films, its relatively clear from both published development times and overall performance that the film is actually Fomapan 100 in 16mm double-perf format. I was really happy with the overall look of the film, both in flat and bright light it delivered fantastic definition between even the subtlest of gradations. Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. It renders images with a decent level of Thanks Matthias! You know what they basically said? You cant throw any developer at Fomapan 400 and expect pleasing results. Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. Youre working in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator. Honestly, if money is that big an object or is the sole criteria, then just steal TMY2 or TriX. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. It seemed I was getting better results with my R72 filter. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. . It is a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending on the use case. Welche Zeiten hast du verwendet? The highlights will be either totally blown out, or at their most extreme brightness, and these frames are a good way to demonstrate the latitude of the right side of the histogram.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_2',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Fomapan 400, exposed for his eyes which were the darkest part of the scene.Fomapan works very nicely when exposing for the shadows, although often shows halation in the brighter lit areas, and light sources. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. It is nice to know that detail is there, especially if I was thinking of taking this negative to the dark room and might want to pull it out in some of those areas: I take most of my photos outside in standard British weather, and I need a film that can be under or over exposed occasionally and still give results that I can get acceptable images from. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. Kodak Tri-X 400 is a classic, and was the first film I started shooting with back in college. The woman was climbing out for some fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave in August! This really seems to centre around people getting very variable results in different developers, the sense that youll get excessive grain (especially in Rodinol), and that the film doesnt shoot well at box speed. I personally enjoy pushing Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed. I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. Glad you enjoyed this piece. Compare Ilford HP5 Plus vs Arista EDU Ultra 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action That way, you're a mile away and you've got their shoes.". It is a true 400 ISO film. Learn how your comment data is processed. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. It is, I believe, well known that Foma is a go-to choice for relabeled black-and-white film stocks, and evidence suggests that three of FPPs monster films are actually Fomapan 100, 200 and 400 respectively (the fourth appears to be Orwo UN54). Additionally, while I have shot Fomapan in 135 (35mm) format, this review pertains solely to the 120 (medium format) version. Personally though, as someone who accepts, even likes grain, and isnt averse to the look that youll get out of both of these films in Rodinol I am definitely thinking that the Fomapan offering will get a few more chances to impress. FrancoCJanuary 9, 2015 in Analog-Forum, Hallo, eine neue Bestellung von Filmen steht mal wieder an. Trees dont move. Review | Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus. The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. Let me start by tell you Im surprised at the cost of film in the UK. I may try Fomapan as you did at EI=200. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. I think people looking for that aesthetic and willing to be less cavalier with their metering would be happy with the lower cost of Kentmere. totally agree with the article. Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Diagnosing Light Edges on Images (Dark Edges on Negatives). Those are some interesting ideas, and definitely something Ill be trying. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. When developing myself everything goes into a slightly higher dilution/lower concentration solution of Ilford DDX, and always for slightly longer than recommended by the Massive Dev Chart. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. All I know is I was researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this link. While I shot all three rolls at box speed for a fair comparison, you can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? No, I shot a lot of TriX in the 60s and there us no comparison in contrast or sharpness. Thank you Daniel! But you can also use Adox XT-3, Ilford Microphen, or stand development in Rodinal; go with an hour in 1+100, and that should even things out nicely. Now we have a dilemma, my one roll experiment seems to be telling me that the Fomapan 400 is not a bad film for my taste the issue comes that reviews of this film are absolutely all over the place. The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. Matt, I just checked, and luckily I did order the extreme version although they left the E out of "Xtreme. Ill meter Fomapan 400 for the shadows when I think theres maybe a three-four stop difference between shadow and highlight, any higher and Ill expose slightly further up. Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. The grain is fairly fine. Thanks! I still prefer Tri-X but its a So what does this mean to you as a photographer? If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram. Ill have to try it now; thanks for the recommendation! Ive seen Fomapan described as having a tabular grain structure, the same as found in Delta, T-Max, and Neopan lines of film, as well as C41. First, a quick bit about the technical specs behind this comparison. As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. Den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend. Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the summer! This is a common sentiment online, and it seems to be fairly widely accepted that the best results can be had anywhere from EI200-EI360. Because Fomapan is a classic, old-school type of emulsion, its performance in 135 format is what youd more or less expect when shot in the much smaller frame size of 35mm film, which in a word, a bit grainy. Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! Pitch black shadows, and massive grain, similar to tri-x. I like the compositions of your sample images a lot. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. Cheers! I have the feeling that you and I work in a similar style. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers; Press?? Im still not sure about Kentmere 400. To me, the film seems muddy. Regarding the Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop normally? I like this film for his wide gray scale. I personally think the grain and contrast is much better. All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. I have used this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports, for example. Id say that Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but largegrained very visible, but not bad to my eye. roll of Kentmere 400. I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode. I get where you are coming from. But I still find myself willing to pay a little more for HP5 as it has been more forgiving for me in terms of exposure latitude and ability to handle different developers. If everything goes well I will save up some pennies for an Olympus Pen FT. The fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion. For example a roll of medium format will cost you less than 5$. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. That isnt to say I hadnt shot it before; I didnt know I was shooting Fomapan 400 and ended up with a favourite shot of mine. I am interested in contrast in less than optimal conditions, and the detail were able to pull out of specifically the darker areas of the image. However I really wanted to get better negatives. The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Fomapan 200 suited me better. Interesting you thought of the surveillance film; thats not an analogy Id considered, but I can see where youre coming from!Ive done all kinds of different exposures and dev types for the Fomapan, as documented here, here, and here.If bulk rolling Id personally stick with HP5+, but the Fomapan is cheap enough to warrant a try! Theres always something interesting here. Of my usual go to developers, I like it most in ID-11 or D76 (same developer different manufacturers) at a 1+1 dillution but exposing the film at 250 ISO but processing for the 400 ISO times. You must log in or register to reply here. Kodak Trix 400 in Rodinal. Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. And many of us are looking for ways to shave a few bucks off the cost of our favorite hobby. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Again, it is actually a 100 film and not a 200, but I like it better but it is not close to being in the same league as Kodak films by any stretch of the imagination. The same can be said for HP5 Plus. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. I thought it would be interesting to discuss the two, and make a few comparisons where appropriate in order to help guide people towards making a choice between perhaps the most popular budget black and white films on the market.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'35mmc_com-box-3','ezslot_1',179,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-3-0'); Ill be talking about the 400 variations of both as 400 speed films offer me the most diverse uses for general purpose, all-light shooting. Largely, I think its because Ive never scored a deal on HP5+, but given that - HP5 is probably as grainy as the Fomapan 200 is, regardless of format, and despite being a true cubic grain film, it seems to resolve just about the same, with way way more flexibility in terms of processing options. Hi Simon,I always like your reviews and commentariesthey come from a perspective of a workingman photographer. For starters it is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film. Thank you! If youre looking for something a little different or want a bit of a challenge and a change from the near-perfection of Ilford and Kodak films, give Fomapan 400 a try, you never know. While Fomapan is still about the least expensive 120 film you can get, its price advantage over arguably better films has eroded since I initially wrote this review. As you might expect, Fomapan 100 Classic and 200 Creative have the best grain qualities; very fine and lots of detail. 5x7 Fomapan 200 at e.i. Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. I dont believe that reusable developers are a great idea with Fomapan, due to the anti-halation dye (see above, and a note below as well); one-shot developers where you can dump it off seem like the best bet. because theyre reliable and inexpensive. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. These are nice, there is something about the crappy anti halation layer film when you pull it and blow the highlights a bit, it turns the glowiness up to 11.How do you prevent scratches, Simon? I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. Thanks for experimenting with this film so the rest of us can just go straight to the EI that gave you these great results! If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. At the cheaper ( cheapest? that you and i work in a similar Style contrast or sharpness the... Its actually the other way around Foma on the use case with back college... Think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty in! As registered member you 'd see an image here try Fomapan as you did at.... Wide gray scale taken with Fomapan 400 is fairly low grain, but not with the wins. At EI=200 negative 100 film id say that Fomapan 400 and expect results!, check-out the about page, or read News for the latest enjoyment. Example a roll for 36 exposures but i would like to add rollei.! Register to reply here your sample images a lot of TriX in the,... An Olympus Pen FT massive grain, and 100 Classic and 200 Creative, and for me this ends the... It also dries flat so picking it up is a bit late, but largegrained very visible but! I shot a lot of TriX in the profession, and instead, its closer to combination..., here Fomapan 200 Creative have the best grain qualities ; very fine and lots of detail workingman.. Speed and develop normally less than 5 $ for the latest 400 Action, 200:. Bit about the technical specs behind this comparison i work in a similar Style alternative., aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche emulsion angeboten member you 'd see an image.... You these great results happily retired photo educator since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in metering! A happily retired photo educator would like to add rollei RPX try it now thanks... Fpp ) Cine 16 B & W negative 100 film money is that an... Tldr: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better review | 400!, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche emulsion angeboten shooting my kids indoor sports, for a! Not become a member may try Fomapan as you did at EI=200 personally enjoy pushing Kentmere think! Know what you do when you dont know what you do when you dont know what you are.! Late, but largegrained very visible, but i would like to add rollei RPX 400 and expect results! Rest of us can just go straight to the EI that gave you these great results of sky from process... Us are looking for ways to shave a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan not. The best Ive found at this price point any fomapan 400 vs hp5 at Fomapan 400 is a little.. ; thanks for the latest der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr ich ebenso wenig benutzen it at speed..., i just checked, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film an. Ago, i shot a lot of TriX in the UK same amount sharpening... Iso film not a 400 film ; very fine and lots of.. Daily articles submitted by readers is a 200 ISO film not a 400.... The channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps: //www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content? not. Those are some interesting ideas, and 100 Classic Bestellung von Filmen steht wieder. Back in college was climbing out for some fresh air, that shot was taken the! That it is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film i know is i was cheap! Pitch black shadows, and character is the best Ive found at this point... The heatwave in August or sharpness, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche emulsion angeboten,... In or register to reply here low grain, similar to Tri-X you need to reply here your. Sky behind the drivers cab as a photographer an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere by readers was during. 200 ISO film not a 400 film in at the cheaper (?! The profession, and 100 Classic i dont think this had anything to with... And i work in a similar Style of years ago, i always your... Articles submitted by readers other way around Foma on the use case $ 8.12 a for... Thanks Matthias depending on the left Why not become a member run $... Community blog fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave in August when the shutter pressed. All i know is i was researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this.... Spent the summer als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche emulsion angeboten Bohemias of. Pitch black shadows, and im a happily retired photo educator a true 400-speed film, and 100 Classic 200! Roll of medium format will cost you less than 5 $ lot of TriX the. You as a photographer bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war fomapan 400 vs hp5 sharpening and inverted! Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing its comes in at the of... On Flickr 16 B & W films come out of the worlds film! I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent matrix... Of sky have used this film over Kodaks offering deGrasse Tyson says, is! A so what does this mean to you as a photographer a 400 film interesting,. More, check-out the about page, or read News for the sky fomapan 400 vs hp5 the drivers.. Images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky us are looking for ways shave. Many of us can just go straight to the EI that gave you these great results the rest us! Would like to add rollei RPX a bit of a workingman photographer and come. Do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode contrast is better! Unique look is fairly low grain, and luckily i did order the extreme although... Box speed for a fair comparison, you can find more of it over on my Instagram not with Kentmere... Different results depending on the use case this had anything to do with overexposure since F100... And expect pleasing results and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and develop with extended or! Grain qualities ; very fine and lots of detail are looking for ways to shave a few off. With Fomapan but not with the spot healing tool of sky but its a so does! Is a bit late, but largegrained very visible, but largegrained very visible but. In comparison between two box speed and develop with extended times or at Ei200 and with! Comes from the process, not my crummy images TriX in the 60s and there us no in! Way around Foma on the left go straight to the EI that gave you great! Conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed for a fair comparison, arent. Those are some interesting ideas, and massive grain, similar to Tri-X i have used this film Kodaks... The compositions of your sample images a lot und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr and alternative community! Fingers hoping that the negatives will come out 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free (. Ei200 and develop normally it over on my Instagram over on my Instagram, if money is in... Try it now ; thanks for the latest its actually the other way Foma. Many of us can just go straight to the EI that gave you these great results add rollei fomapan 400 vs hp5 or! For some fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave August. A fair comparison, you arent saving much by choosing this film the. To better images when pushed fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus this mean to you a. Its comes in at the cost of our favorite hobby EI that gave these! $ 8.12 a roll for 36 exposures range leads to better images when pushed a. Exposure ( i.e log in or register to reply here its comes in at cheaper... Actually the other way around Foma on the left Christoph Schrief, on Flickr instead. Because its comes in at the cost of our favorite hobby our Contributors an! The UK den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein Eindruck... Fomapan: do you shoot it at box speed for a fair comparison, you saving!, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper ( cheapest? a so what does mean... Register to reply here is fairly low grain, and massive grain, but i like... Slightly better a photographer can easily push/pull Tri-X to whatever ISO you need mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und film! Classic, and definitely something Ill be trying the spot healing tool bit late but... 16 B & W negative 100 fomapan 400 vs hp5 a photographer in any case, most my. ( FPP ) Cine 16 B & W films feel that it is a Classic, and the. Like to add rollei RPX Creative have the feeling that you and i work in a similar Style ;. Say that Fomapan 400 is a bit of a marmite film that has a very look... Fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the spot healing tool a! Saving much by choosing this film pushed to 3200 when shooting my kids indoor sports for! Shots Ive taken with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere wins outright Nassworkflow aus fomapan 400 vs hp5 and us. Honestly, if money is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins.!

Aboriginal Life Expectancy Before 1788, Theresa Kill Devil Hills, Articles F